RE: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: storvsc: Support manual scan of FC hosts on Hyper-V
From: KY Srinivasan
Date: Tue Mar 15 2016 - 19:01:11 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin K. Petersen [mailto:martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 2:25 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> ohering@xxxxxxxx; jbottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx;
> martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx; hare@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: storvsc: Support manual scan of FC hosts on
> Hyper-V
>
> >>>>> "KY" == KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> KY> Till recently I had not. However, we do support publishing wwn in
> KY> the guest and some customers wanted this. That is the reason I am
> KY> attaching FC transport and working through the issues. With this
> KY> change, I now have wwn names published in the guest and I can also
> KY> issue manual scan.
>
> Why does it have to look like FC? Will a device identification VPD page
> not do the trick?
How would I get the sysfs files under fc_host if I don't use the FC transport.
The customer scripts expect these sysfs files.
Regards,
K. Y
>
> --
> Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering