RE: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: storvsc: Support manual scan of FC hosts on Hyper-V
From: KY Srinivasan
Date: Wed Mar 16 2016 - 19:30:55 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Bottomley [mailto:James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 4:08 PM
> To: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>; KY Srinivasan
> <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> ohering@xxxxxxxx; jbottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx;
> hare@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: storvsc: Support manual scan of FC hosts on
> Hyper-V
>
> On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 18:34 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > > > > > > "KY" == KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > KY> How would I get the sysfs files under fc_host if I don't use the
> > FC
> > KY> transport. The customer scripts expect these sysfs files.
> >
> > Right, but I was interested in finding out why they need those
> > files. And whether an alternative to the FC transport would be a
> > better solution.
>
> If it's just the wwn file (or a set of other values), we might be able
> to separate that bit out of the FC transport class so you can use it
> independently ... do you have a full list of the files being used?
Wwn files are what we can support on Hyper-V and that is what I want to support
(to address customer requirements).
Regards,
K. Y