Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size"
From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Thu Mar 17 2016 - 10:27:33 EST
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:26:08AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >Why do you need your own defconfig? If it's just on the short term until
> >all your code is upstream, that's fine, but this goes against the single
> >Image aim. I would like defconfig to cover all supported SoCs (and yes,
> >ACPI on by default once we deem it !EXPERT anymore), though at some
> >point we may need a server/mobile split (if the generated image is too
> >large, maybe more stuff being built as modules).
>
> Yes, that's exactly it. Ours is an ACPI system, and so we have to have our
> own defconfig for now. We're holding off on pushing our own defconfig
> changes (enabling drivers, etc) until ACPI is enabled in
> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig.
Is there anything that prevents you from providing a dtb/dts for this
SoC?
--
Catalin