Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH 2/2] mfd: max14577: Allow driver to be built as a module

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Chanwoo,

On 03/17/2016 12:37 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> 
> On 03/16/2016 10:58 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 2016ë 03ì 17ì 01:48, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

[snip]

>>>
>>
>> When I test the kernel build with these patch-set on next-20160316 tag,
>> the following errors happen. 
>>
> 
> You are absolutely right, there was an error on my test script and always
> built it as built-in instead of as a module. I'm so sorry about that...
> 
>> ERROR: "maxim_charger_calc_reg_current" [drivers/regulator/max14577.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "maxim_charger_currents" [drivers/regulator/max14577.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "maxim_charger_currents" [drivers/power/max14577_charger.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "maxim_charger_calc_reg_current" [drivers/power/max14577_charger.ko] undefined!
>>
> 
> This seems to be a latent bug that was exposed by making the max14577 MFD
> Kconfig symbol tristate. Since I'm able to reproduce it even without the
> patches by enabling the max14577 regulator and power drivers as a module.
>

Sorry again, this error goes away after I clean the build directory so it
does not happen without this patch-set. Now, I found what's the issue and
is that both the max14577 MFD and regulator drivers have the same object
file name so they both end being called max14577.ko.

This confuses Kbuild and so in the modpost step, the exported symbols by
the MFD driver don't end into Module.symvers. This doesn't happen when
the driver is not a module since symbols come from the vmlinux binary.

I'll post a patch to rename the regulator driver to max14577-regulator,
this will be necessary anyways to have max14577 as a module since Kbuild
also gets confused and don't copy both modules because have the same name.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America