Re: [PATCH v11 1/9] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature

From: David Long
Date: Fri Mar 18 2016 - 09:06:28 EST


On 03/11/2016 01:07 PM, James Morse wrote:
Hi David,

On 09/03/16 05:32, David Long wrote:
From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@xxxxxxxxxx>

Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature for arm64.

Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
index ff7f132..efebf0f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c

[ ... SNIP ... ]

+/**
+ * regs_within_kernel_stack() - check the address in the stack
+ * @regs: pt_regs which contains kernel stack pointer.
+ * @addr: address which is checked.
+ *
+ * regs_within_kernel_stack() checks @addr is within the kernel stack page(s).
+ * If @addr is within the kernel stack, it returns true. If not, returns false.
+ */
+bool regs_within_kernel_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr)
+{
+ return ((addr & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)) ==
+ (kernel_stack_pointer(regs) & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)));

I'm not sure where this is called from, but if kernel_stack_pointer(regs) could
ever point into an irq_stack you will get the wrong result.

arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h has 'on_irq_stack(sp, cpu)' which should help,
although you will need to check the bounds of the irq_stack separately.


The horrible details...

From arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:20
/* irq stack only needs to be 16 byte aligned - not IRQ_STACK_SIZE aligned. */
DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [IRQ_STACK_SIZE/sizeof(long)], irq_stack)
__aligned(16);

This was because per-cpu variables can be at-most page aligned.
6cdf9c7ca687 ("arm64: Store struct thread_info in sp_el0") changed
current_thread_info() to work on these weirdly aligned irq_stacks.


Thanks,

James



It looks like this is ultimately used (currently) only by the arch-independent kprobes tracing code. But it does seem like this will be recording the wrong data when stack contents are being traced from interrupt routine probes. I will put a fix in for the next spin.

Thanks,
-dl