Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks
From: Jeff Moyer
Date: Fri Mar 18 2016 - 11:15:35 EST
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes:
> I do think that using TRIM in various causes where we are doing an
> fallocate does make sense for non-rotational devices. In general TRIM
> should be fast enough that that I'd be surprised that people would be
> complaining --- especially since most of the time, fallocate isn't on
> the timing-critical path of most applications.
TRIM/UNMAP isn't just supported on solid state devices, though. I do
recall some enterprise thinly provisioned storage that would take ages
to discard large regions. I think that caused us to change the defaults
for mkfs, right?
Cheers,
Jeff