Re: [PATCH] serial-uartlite: fix build warning

From: Peter Hurley
Date: Fri Mar 18 2016 - 15:19:51 EST


On 03/18/2016 10:48 AM, Maarten Brock wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven [mailto:geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> To: Sudip Mukherjee [mailto:sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx]
> Cc: Peter Korsgaard [mailto:jacmet@xxxxxxxxxx], Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx], Jiri Slaby [mailto:jslaby@xxxxxxxx], linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx], linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:48:06 +0100
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial-uartlite: fix build warning
>
>
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Sudip Mukherjee
>> <sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> We were getting build warnings about:
>>> drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c: In function âulite_request_portâ:
>>> drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c:348:21: warning: assignment discards
>>> 'const' qualifier from pointer target type
>>> port->private_data = &uartlite_be;
>>> ^
>>> drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c:354:22: warning: assignment discards
>>> 'const' qualifier from pointer target type
>>> port->private_data = &uartlite_le;
>>> ^
>>>
>>> Fixes: 2905697a82ea ("serial-uartlite: Constify uartlite_be/uartlite_le")
>>> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>>
>> Geert
>
> Reverting is not the same as fixing.

I agree; better to revert commit 2905697a82ea and let Maarten re-submit
a patch that doesn't generate build warnings.


> Rant:
> It is a stupid warning IMHO, but being a compiler writer myself (SDCC) I
> understand how it can arise. If you assign some const pointer to a void
> pointer without an explicit cast gcc does not complain about the complete
> loss of type, but it does warn about losing constness. In general I'd say:
> make up your mind; either warn about both or don't warn about either.

memcpy

Regards,
Peter Hurley