Re: [PATCH] Remove v850 from linux/elf-em.h

[David Daney]

On 03/18/2016 06:15 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 03/18/2016 12:46 PM, David Daney wrote:
> > I am not going to comment on it any more, but [commenting more]
>
> Yes you are. (And did then too.)
>
> > On 03/17/2016 07:32 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> > [...]
> > > As I explained last email, userspace uses the libc header, not the linux
> > > header,
> >
> > The fallacy in this argument is the assertion that we know what
> > userspace does.
>
> Userspace programs that did that already broke on earlier symbol removals.
>
> > Userspace could easily do:
> >
> > #include <linux/elf-em.h>
> > .
> >     case SYMBOL_YOU_WANT_TO_REMOVE:
> >
> >   ÂBOOM!  it is broken.
>
> So you're assuming I don't know how headers get used by userspace.

Yes, exactly.  Don't feel bad about it though, because nobody else knows 
either.

> That's nice. Clearly, I never would have thought of that.
>
> Once again, "As I explained last email", symbols have been removed from
> this particular header before.

Since you know, a priori, that symbols in that file are never used by 
userspace, why not send a patch that moves it to include/linux/elf-em.h 
so that userspace doesn't see it?  Then you could remove as many symbols 
as you like.

David Daney

[...]