[PATCH v6 6/7][Resend] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon Mar 21 2016 - 21:58:14 EST
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Modify the ACPI cpufreq driver to provide a method for switching
CPU frequencies from interrupt context and update the cpufreq core
to support that method if available.
Introduce a new cpufreq driver callback, ->fast_switch, to be
invoked for frequency switching from interrupt context by (future)
governors supporting that feature via (new) helper function
cpufreq_driver_fast_switch().
Add two new policy flags, fast_switch_possible, to be set by the
cpufreq driver if fast frequency switching can be used for the
given policy and fast_switch_enabled, to be set by the governor
if it is going to use fast frequency switching for the given
policy. Also add a helper for setting the latter.
Since fast frequency switching is inherently incompatible with
cpufreq transition notifiers, make it possible to set the
fast_switch_enabled only if there are no transition notifiers
already registered and make the registration of new transition
notifiers fail if fast_switch_enabled is set for at least one
policy.
Implement the ->fast_switch callback in the ACPI cpufreq driver
and make it set fast_switch_possible during policy initialization
as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes from v5:
- cpufreq_enable_fast_switch() fixed to avoid printing a confusing message
if fast_switch_possible is not set for the policy.
- Fixed a typo in that message.
- Removed the WARN_ON() from the (cpufreq_fast_switch_count > 0) check in
cpufreq_register_notifier(), because it triggered false-positive warnings
from the cpufreq_stats module (cpufreq_stats don't work with the fast
switching, because it is based on notifiers).
Changes from v4:
- If cpufreq_enable_fast_switch() is about to fail, it will print the list
of currently registered transition notifiers.
- Added lock_assert_held(&policy->rwsem) to cpufreq_enable_fast_switch().
- Added WARN_ON() to the (cpufreq_fast_switch_count > 0) check in
cpufreq_register_notifier().
- Modified the kerneldoc comment of cpufreq_driver_fast_switch() to
mention the RELATION_L expectation regarding the ->fast_switch callback.
Changes from v3:
- New fast_switch_enabled field in struct cpufreq_policy to help
avoid affecting existing setups by setting the fast_switch_possible
flag in the driver.
- __cpufreq_get() skips the policy->cur check if fast_switch_enabled is set.
Changes from v2:
- The driver ->fast_switch callback and cpufreq_driver_fast_switch()
don't need the relation argument as they will always do RELATION_L now.
- New mechanism to make fast switch and cpufreq notifiers mutually
exclusive.
- cpufreq_driver_fast_switch() doesn't do anything in addition to
invoking the driver callback and returns its return value.
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 41 ++++++++++++
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 9 ++
3 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -458,6 +458,43 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cp
return result;
}
+unsigned int acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int target_freq)
+{
+ struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
+ struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *entry;
+ unsigned int next_perf_state, next_freq, freq;
+
+ /*
+ * Find the closest frequency above target_freq.
+ *
+ * The table is sorted in the reverse order with respect to the
+ * frequency and all of the entries are valid (see the initialization).
+ */
+ entry = data->freq_table;
+ do {
+ entry++;
+ freq = entry->frequency;
+ } while (freq >= target_freq && freq != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END);
+ entry--;
+ next_freq = entry->frequency;
+ next_perf_state = entry->driver_data;
+
+ perf = to_perf_data(data);
+ if (perf->state == next_perf_state) {
+ if (unlikely(data->resume))
+ data->resume = 0;
+ else
+ return next_freq;
+ }
+
+ data->cpu_freq_write(&perf->control_register,
+ perf->states[next_perf_state].control);
+ perf->state = next_perf_state;
+ return next_freq;
+}
+
static unsigned long
acpi_cpufreq_guess_freq(struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data, unsigned int cpu)
{
@@ -740,6 +777,9 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct
goto err_unreg;
}
+ policy->fast_switch_possible = !acpi_pstate_strict &&
+ !(policy_is_shared(policy) && policy->shared_type != CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY);
+
data->freq_table = kzalloc(sizeof(*data->freq_table) *
(perf->state_count+1), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!data->freq_table) {
@@ -874,6 +914,7 @@ static struct freq_attr *acpi_cpufreq_at
static struct cpufreq_driver acpi_cpufreq_driver = {
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.target_index = acpi_cpufreq_target,
+ .fast_switch = acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch,
.bios_limit = acpi_processor_get_bios_limit,
.init = acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init,
.exit = acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit,
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -102,6 +102,10 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
*/
struct rw_semaphore rwsem;
+ /* Fast switch flags */
+ bool fast_switch_possible; /* Set by the driver. */
+ bool fast_switch_enabled;
+
/* Synchronization for frequency transitions */
bool transition_ongoing; /* Tracks transition status */
spinlock_t transition_lock;
@@ -156,6 +160,7 @@ int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_po
int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu);
bool have_governor_per_policy(void);
struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
+void cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
#else
static inline unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
{
@@ -236,6 +241,8 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
unsigned int relation); /* Deprecated */
int (*target_index)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index);
+ unsigned int (*fast_switch)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int target_freq);
/*
* Only for drivers with target_index() and CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION
* unset.
@@ -464,6 +471,8 @@ struct cpufreq_governor {
};
/* Pass a target to the cpufreq driver */
+unsigned int cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int target_freq);
int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation);
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -428,6 +428,57 @@ void cpufreq_freq_transition_end(struct
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_freq_transition_end);
+/*
+ * Fast frequency switching status count. Positive means "enabled", negative
+ * means "disabled" and 0 means "not decided yet".
+ */
+static int cpufreq_fast_switch_count;
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_fast_switch_lock);
+
+static void cpufreq_list_transition_notifiers(void)
+{
+ struct notifier_block *nb;
+
+ pr_info("cpufreq: Registered transition notifiers:\n");
+
+ mutex_lock(&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list.mutex);
+
+ for (nb = cpufreq_transition_notifier_list.head; nb; nb = nb->next)
+ pr_info("cpufreq: %pF\n", nb->notifier_call);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list.mutex);
+}
+
+/**
+ * cpufreq_enable_fast_switch - Enable fast frequency switching for policy.
+ * @policy: cpufreq policy to enable fast frequency switching for.
+ *
+ * Try to enable fast frequency switching for @policy.
+ *
+ * The attempt will fail if there is at least one transition notifier registered
+ * at this point, as fast frequency switching is quite fundamentally at odds
+ * with transition notifiers. Thus if successful, it will make registration of
+ * transition notifiers fail going forward.
+ */
+void cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&policy->rwsem);
+
+ if (!policy->fast_switch_possible)
+ return;
+
+ mutex_lock(&cpufreq_fast_switch_lock);
+ if (cpufreq_fast_switch_count >= 0) {
+ cpufreq_fast_switch_count++;
+ policy->fast_switch_enabled = true;
+ } else {
+ pr_warn("cpufreq: CPU%u: Fast frequency switching not enabled\n",
+ policy->cpu);
+ cpufreq_list_transition_notifiers();
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_fast_switch_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_enable_fast_switch);
/*********************************************************************
* SYSFS INTERFACE *
@@ -1083,6 +1134,24 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct c
kfree(policy);
}
+static void cpufreq_driver_exit_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ if (policy->fast_switch_enabled) {
+ mutex_lock(&cpufreq_fast_switch_lock);
+
+ policy->fast_switch_enabled = false;
+ if (!WARN_ON(cpufreq_fast_switch_count <= 0))
+ cpufreq_fast_switch_count--;
+
+ mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_fast_switch_lock);
+ }
+
+ if (cpufreq_driver->exit) {
+ cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
+ policy->freq_table = NULL;
+ }
+}
+
static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
@@ -1236,8 +1305,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int c
out_exit_policy:
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
- if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
- cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
+ cpufreq_driver_exit_policy(policy);
out_free_policy:
cpufreq_policy_free(policy, !new_policy);
return ret;
@@ -1334,10 +1402,7 @@ static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int
* since this is a core component, and is essential for the
* subsequent light-weight ->init() to succeed.
*/
- if (cpufreq_driver->exit) {
- cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
- policy->freq_table = NULL;
- }
+ cpufreq_driver_exit_policy(policy);
unlock:
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
@@ -1452,8 +1517,12 @@ static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct
ret_freq = cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu);
- /* Updating inactive policies is invalid, so avoid doing that. */
- if (unlikely(policy_is_inactive(policy)))
+ /*
+ * Updating inactive policies is invalid, so avoid doing that. Also
+ * if fast frequency switching is used with the given policy, the check
+ * against policy->cur is pointless, so skip it in that case too.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(policy_is_inactive(policy)) || policy->fast_switch_enabled)
return ret_freq;
if (ret_freq && policy->cur &&
@@ -1465,7 +1534,6 @@ static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct
schedule_work(&policy->update);
}
}
-
return ret_freq;
}
@@ -1672,8 +1740,18 @@ int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct not
switch (list) {
case CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER:
+ mutex_lock(&cpufreq_fast_switch_lock);
+
+ if (cpufreq_fast_switch_count > 0) {
+ mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_fast_switch_lock);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
ret = srcu_notifier_chain_register(
&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list, nb);
+ if (!ret)
+ cpufreq_fast_switch_count--;
+
+ mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_fast_switch_lock);
break;
case CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER:
ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(
@@ -1706,8 +1784,14 @@ int cpufreq_unregister_notifier(struct n
switch (list) {
case CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER:
+ mutex_lock(&cpufreq_fast_switch_lock);
+
ret = srcu_notifier_chain_unregister(
&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list, nb);
+ if (!ret && !WARN_ON(cpufreq_fast_switch_count >= 0))
+ cpufreq_fast_switch_count++;
+
+ mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_fast_switch_lock);
break;
case CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER:
ret = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(
@@ -1726,6 +1810,34 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_unregister_notifie
* GOVERNORS *
*********************************************************************/
+/**
+ * cpufreq_driver_fast_switch - Carry out a fast CPU frequency switch.
+ * @policy: cpufreq policy to switch the frequency for.
+ * @target_freq: New frequency to set (may be approximate).
+ *
+ * Carry out a fast frequency switch from interrupt context.
+ *
+ * The driver's ->fast_switch() callback invoked by this function is expected to
+ * select the minimum available frequency greater than or equal to @target_freq
+ * (CPUFREQ_RELATION_L).
+ *
+ * This function must not be called if policy->fast_switch_enabled is unset.
+ *
+ * Governors calling this function must guarantee that it will never be invoked
+ * twice in parallel for the same policy and that it will never be called in
+ * parallel with either ->target() or ->target_index() for the same policy.
+ *
+ * If CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID is returned by the driver's ->fast_switch()
+ * callback to indicate an error condition, the hardware configuration must be
+ * preserved.
+ */
+unsigned int cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int target_freq)
+{
+ return cpufreq_driver->fast_switch(policy, target_freq);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_driver_fast_switch);
+
/* Must set freqs->new to intermediate frequency */
static int __target_intermediate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs, int index)