On 03/17/2016 08:21 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 17/03/16 19:00, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 17/03/16 17:09, Rob Herring wrote:
That would not be an SP804 nor would the vendor be ARM in that case. So
add a new compatible string for the vendor that decided to hack up ARM's
IP block.
By all accounts this is some ancient reference design[1] which later evolved
_into_ the SP804, so that vendor would probably still be ARM ;)
Right.
A separate compatible string would indeed make more sense, though. Both
semantically and in terms of letting the driver account for the differences
automatically.
Robin.
[1]:http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0170a/I350250.html
Humm, same as integrator timers perhaps?
Having had a quick look, what the Integrator/AP manual describes certainly smells like the same basic block as the "AMBA Timer" - 16 bit counters and the same control register layout - albeit in a mutant triple-timer version with a bigger offset between each register set. Integrator/CP, on the other hand, looks much more SP804-like.
Robin.
Hi,
I will switch to oxsemi,ox810se-rps-timer since it need a specific register width that will be handled by the driver.
Thanks,
Neil
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel