Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration"
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy
Date: Fri Mar 25 2016 - 10:52:40 EST
On 25.03.2016 13:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 09:52:01PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> This reverts commit 909f7ee0b5f30f735e16864a7ed18d2e6123e6d9.
>> Apparently due to a wrongly resolved merge conflict between two
>> branches, which contained the same commit, the commit contents
>> partially was added two times in a row.
> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> subsystem. This makes it easier for people to identify relevant
Okay, submitting of reverted patches is different I believe:
I think it's sensible to keep at least the summary line of
a 'git revert' intact rather than inventing our own.
That discussion was about a8cf81ffe028 '(Revert "[ARM] unconditionally
define __virt_to_phys and __phys_to_virt")'
With best wishes,