Question on rhashtable in worst-case scenario.
From: Ben Greear
Date: Mon Mar 28 2016 - 16:29:25 EST
I have a use case for mac80211 where I create multiple stations to
the same remote peer MAC address.
I'm seeing cases where the rhashtable logic is returning -16 (EBUSY)
on insert (see sta_info_hash_add).
This is with the 4.4.6+ (plus local patches) kernel, and it has the patch mentioned
If I understand the code properly, my use case is going to be worst-case scenario,
where all of my items in the hash have the same key (peer mac addr).
I have my own secondary hash to handle most of my hot-path lookups, but I still need
the main hash to at least function in a linear-search manner.
Any idea what I can do to get rid of the EBUSY return code problem, or how
to debug it further?
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com