Re: [PATCH 0/3] nohz: Convert tick dependency mask to atomic_t

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 03:05:14PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Harmonizing thread_info::flags does not look easy, given how much assembly code
> > > > accesses this field.
> > > 
> > > It might not be too bad.
> > > 
> > > For 32-bit architectures (which is still most of them), it's just a
> > > 
> > >    unsigned int/long -> atomic_t
> > > 
> > > and for 64-bit architectures you end up with three choices:
> > > 
> > >  - it's already 32-bit (alpha, ia64, x86):
> > > 
> > >         unsigned int -> atomic_t
> > > 
> > >  - little-endian long:
> > > 
> > >         atomic_t flags
> > >         unsigned int padding;
> > > 
> > >  - big-endian long (only powerpc? Maybe there's a big-endian MIPS still?)
> > > 
> > >         unsigned int padding;
> > >         atomic_t flags;
> > 
> > Hm, that indeed sounds fairly nice and doable - I thought some architectures do 
> > have a task flag above bit 31, but that does not appear to be so ...
> > 
> > Right now we seem to have 27 bits defined in include/linux/sched.h, with 5 more 
> > bits left for the future. Here's their current usage histogram in the kernel 
> > source:
> > 
> >   PF_KTHREAD                    : 68
> >   PF_MEMALLOC                   : 65
> 
> Argh, my reading comprehension skills suck today.
> 
> That's a totally useless analysis of task_struct::flags, while we want to convert 
> thread_info::flags...

Actually we want to convert that one too :-)
In fact I planned to start there.