You missed CC'ing Phil (Added for this post)
On Tuesday 29 March 2016 20:53:58, Yong Li wrote:
Thanks for your comment, I think I can change it to val | (val
<< 8), is it okay ?
Mh, currently there is only one caller (device_pca953x_init) which passes only
0, 0 or 0xff, 0xff, so endianess is irrelevant. But to be future proof this
should be done in an endian-safe manner. Though cpu_to_le16p does not work,
due to same alignment problem as casting to u16*.