Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph fixes for -rc7
Date: Tue Mar 29 2016 - 20:24:59 EST
On Fri, Mar 25 2016, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:02 AM, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 06 2016, Sage Weil wrote:
>>> Hi Linus,
>>> Please pull the following Ceph patch from
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sage/ceph-client.git for-linus
>>> This is a final commit we missed to align the protocol compatibility with
>>> the feature bits. It decodes a few extra fields in two different messages
>>> and reports EIO when they are used (not yet supported).
>>> Yan, Zheng (1):
>>> ceph: initial CEPH_FEATURE_FS_FILE_LAYOUT_V2 support
>> Just wondering, but was CEPH_FEATURE_FS_FILE_LAYOUT_V2 supposed to have
>> exactly the same value as CEPH_FEATURE_NEW_OSDOPREPLY_ENCODING (and
> Yes, that was the point of getting it merged into -rc7.
I did wonder if that might be the case.
>> Because when I backported this patch (and many others) to some ancient
>> enterprise kernel, it caused mounts to fail. If it really is meant to
>> be the same value, then I must have some other backported issue to find
>> and fix.
> It has to be backported in concert with changes that add support for
> the other two bits.
I have everything from fs/ceph and net/ceph as of 4.5, with adjustments
for different core code.
> How did mount fail?
"can't read superblock".
[ 50.822479] libceph: client144098 fsid 2b73bc29-3e78-490a-8fc6-21da1bf901ba
[ 50.823746] libceph: mon0 192.168.1.122:6789 session established
[ 51.635312] ceph: problem parsing mds trace -5
[ 51.635317] ceph: mds parse_reply err -5
[ 51.635318] ceph: mdsc_handle_reply got corrupt reply mds0(tid:1)
then a hex dump of header:, front: footer:
Maybe my MDS is causing the problem? It is based on v10.0.5 which
#define CEPH_FEATURE_CRUSH_TUNABLES5 (1ULL<<58) /* chooseleaf stable mode */
// duplicated since it was introduced at the same time as CEPH_FEATURE_CRUSH_TUN
#define CEPH_FEATURE_NEW_OSDOPREPLY_ENCODING (1ULL<<58) /* New, v7 encoding */
in ceph_features.h i.e. two features using bit 58, but not
Should I expect Linux 4.5 to work with ceph 10.0.5 ??
Description: PGP signature