[PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 161/218] ARC: bitops: Remove non relevant comments

[Kamal Mostafa]

4.2.8-ckt7 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 2a41b6dc28dc71c1a3f1622612a26edc58f7561e upstream.

commit 80f420842ff42 removed the ARC bitops microoptimization but failed
to prune the comments to same effect

Fixes: 80f420842ff42 ("ARC: Make ARC bitops "safer" (add anti-optimization)")
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arc/include/asm/bitops.h | 15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/bitops.h
index 57c1f33..0352fb8 100644
--- a/arch/arc/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -35,21 +35,6 @@ static inline void op##_bit(unsigned long nr, volatile unsigned long *m)\
 									\
 	m += nr >> 5;							\
 									\
-	/*								\
-	 * ARC ISA micro-optimization:					\
-	 *								\
-	 * Instructions dealing with bitpos only consider lower 5 bits	\
-	 * e.g (x << 33) is handled like (x << 1) by ASL instruction	\
-	 *  (mem pointer still needs adjustment to point to next word)	\
-	 *								\
-	 * Hence the masking to clamp @nr arg can be elided in general.	\
-	 *								\
-	 * However if @nr is a constant (above assumed in a register),	\
-	 * and greater than 31, gcc can optimize away (x << 33) to 0,	\
-	 * as overflow, given the 32-bit ISA. Thus masking needs to be	\
-	 * done for const @nr, but no code is generated due to gcc	\
-	 * const prop.							\
-	 */								\
 	nr &= 0x1f;							\
 									\
 	__asm__ __volatile__(						\
-- 
2.7.4