Re: [RESPIN 1/6] dt-bindings: EXYNOS: Add exynos-srom device tree binding

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 05.03.2016 13:42, pankaj.dubey wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wednesday 02 March 2016 11:23 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:03:37PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>>> This patch adds exynos-srom binding information for SROM Controller
>>> driver on Exynos SoCs.
>>>
>>> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt   | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..33886d5
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
>>> +SAMSUNG Exynos SoCs SROM Controller driver.
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible : Should contain "samsung,exynos-srom".
>>
>> There should be SoC specific compatible strings in addition to this.
>>
> 
> I do not understood need to additional need to SoC specific compatible,
> as of now all SoCs having SROM can work with exynos specific common
> compatible. Will you see any issues in this?

Dear Rob, Pankaj,

I would like to proceed with this patchset. I guess your comment here
was about to change the compatible from generic exynos-like to a model
specific. How about this:
- compatible : Should contain "samsung,exynos4210-srom".

Is this okay?

(the oldest chip mentioning SROM controller as separate block is Exynos4210)


Best regards,
Krzysztof