Re: [RFC PATCH v1.9 00/14] livepatch: hybrid consistency model
From: Miroslav Benes
Date: Tue Apr 05 2016 - 10:53:51 EST
On Tue, 5 Apr 2016, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 04:24:33PM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >
> > > > I'd add a fake signal facility for sleeping non-migrated tasks. This
> > > > would accelerate a migration to a new universe. We have it in kgraft for
> > > > quite some time and it worked out great. See
> > > > lkml.kernel.org/r/1430739625-4658-9-git-send-email-jslaby@xxxxxxx which
> > > > went with Jiri's kgraft-on-klp patch set. See also Oleg's reply as it is
> > > > important (I changed kgraft implementation according to that).
> > >
> > > Ok, I'll look into sending a fake signal to remaining tasks.
> >
> > Oh, do not worry about this one. I can prepare a patch once we discuss and
> > review the rest. I think you have a lot on your plate even now.
> >
> > There are several options how to do it. I think it would be nice not send
> > a fake signal immediately. So we can...
> >
> > 1. do it after some time of waiting, or
> >
> > 2. we can have a knob in sysfs for an admin to send a fake signal if he
> > does not want to wait anymore, or
> >
> > 3. (and this is crazy one) we can trace the progress of a migration and
> > when there is none for several iterations we can send a signal
>
> Ok, thanks, I'll skip it for now. We do need to think about the options
> and I do have a full plate already.
>
> I might also procrastinate with the patch module removal patch, since
> that's another separate piece which might need more discussion.
I'll do this one as well.
Miroslav