Re: [RFC v2 3/7] Improve the tracking of active utilisation

[luca abeni]

On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:48:03 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:12:29PM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote:
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We cannot use inactive_task_timer() to invoke sub_running_bw()
> > +	 * at the 0-lag time, because the task could have been migrated
> > +	 * while SCHED_OTHER in the meanwhile.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.inactive_timer) &&
> > +		!hrtimer_callback_running(&p->dl.inactive_timer))
> >  		sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
> 
> hrtimer_is_queued() ?

Uhm... I do not remember why I used this condition, but hrtimer_is_queued()
should be the right thing to be used, yes... I'll update the patch.



			Thanks,
				Luca