Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] usb: mux: add common code for Intel dual role port mux
From: Lu Baolu
Date: Wed Apr 06 2016 - 01:59:07 EST
Hi,
On 03/11/2016 07:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 01:39:43PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 15:53 +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-platform b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-platform
>>> index 5172a61..a2261cb 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-platform
>>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-platform
>>> @@ -18,3 +18,18 @@ Description:
>>> devices to opt-out of driver binding using a driver_override
>>> name such as "none". Only a single driver may be specified in
>>> the override, there is no support for parsing delimiters.
>>> +
>>> +What: /sys/bus/platform/devices/.../intel_mux
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there any reason to call this "intel_mux"? We want a common interface
>> for such things. So how about "role_mux" or "master_slave_mux"?
> I agree, don't make this intel specific, as it shouldn't be.
>
By the way, do you expect a class for port mux in sysfs?
Best regards,
Baolu