Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] usb: mux: add common code for Intel dual role port mux
From: Felipe Balbi
Date: Thu Apr 07 2016 - 01:02:37 EST
Hi,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:19:04PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> > What happened to getting internal help in designing this api? This
>> > shouldn't be my job :)
>>
>> I looked at this Baolu but, at least to me, it's unclear what you're
>> hinting here. Sure, the API is a bit odd in that we register a mux and
>> unregister a device (that has been fixed), but is there anything else ?
>
> I don't remember anymore, that was a few thousand emails ago...
>
> But the suggestion about using devm_* shows that the original author
> has very little understanding about how the driver model works at all,
> which doesn't give me much hope at the moment...
fair enough, that can also be 'fixed' with experience, right ? Just
takes time ;-)
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature