Re: [PATCH] usb: f_mass_storage: test whether thread is running before starting another

[Michal Nazarewicz]

>> On Tue, Apr 05 2016, Alan Stern wrote:
>>> Suppose one usb_function is carrying out an I/O operation while
>>> another one in the same config gets a Set-Interface request from the
>>> host.

> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> That cannot happen.  A single instance of mass_storage cannot be added
>> twice to the same configuration.
>> 
>> Â To be more precise, not via configfs.  A legacy gadget could do that,
>>   but that would be a bug in that legacy driver, not f_mass_storage.
>>   Moreover, no current legacy gadgets do that though so IMO this is an
>>   academic discussion.

On Wed, Apr 06 2016, Alan Stern wrote:
> Okay.  Then I suggest adding this explanation to the patch
> description.

Sounds good to me.  Iâd love someone to test this patch (I sadly have no
way of doing that at the moment) and with that I can resend it with
updated message.

> BTW, is configfs capable of adding a single instance twice in different 
> configs?  Or is that again something only legacy gadgets can do?

I donât think so.  I might be wrong though, but hereâs configuration
from the original post:

	mkdir functions/mass_storage.0
	echo $file > functions/mass_storage.0/lun.0/file
	ln -s functions/mass_storage.0 configs/c.1
	ln -s functions/mass_storage.0 configs/c.2

This makes me suspect itâs not possible to link a function instance to
the same configuration twice, but now that I think about it, Iâm not
quite sure what would happen if one did:

	ln -s functions/mass_storage.0 configs/c.1/foo
	ln -s functions/mass_storage.0 configs/c.1/bar

-- 
Best regards
ããã âðððð86â ãããããã
ÂIf at first you donât succeed, give up skydivingÂ