Re: [PATCH v3 01/19] clk: composite: Add unregister function

From: Maxime Ripard
Date: Sun Apr 10 2016 - 11:26:06 EST


Hi Stephen, Mike,

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:38:24PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The composite clock didn't have any unregistration function, which forced
> us to use clk_unregister directly on it.
>
> While it was already not great from an API point of view, it also meant
> that we were leaking the clk_composite structure allocated in
> clk_register_composite.
>
> Add a clk_unregister_composite function to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Any comment on this one ?

(and the other clock patches)

Thanks,
Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature