Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm/hugetlb: Protect follow_huge_(pud|pgd) functions from race

[Balbir Singh]

On 11/04/16 15:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 02:56 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>
>> On 07/04/16 15:37, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>> follow_huge_(pmd|pud|pgd) functions are used to walk the page table and
>>>> fetch the page struct during 'follow_page_mask' call. There are possible
>>>> race conditions faced by these functions which arise out of simultaneous
>>>> calls of move_pages() and freeing of huge pages. This was fixed partly
>>>> by the previous commit e66f17ff7177 ("mm/hugetlb: take page table lock
>>>> in follow_huge_pmd()") for only PMD based huge pages.
>>>>
>>>> After implementing similar logic, functions like follow_huge_(pud|pgd)
>>>> are now safe from above mentioned race conditions and also can support
>>>> FOLL_GET. Generic version of the function 'follow_huge_addr' has been
>>>> left as it is and its upto the architecture to decide on it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  include/linux/mm.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  mm/hugetlb.c       | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>>  2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
>>>> index ffcff53..734182a 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
>>>> @@ -1751,6 +1751,19 @@ static inline void pgtable_page_dtor(struct page *page)
>>>>  		NULL: pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address))
>>>>  
>>>>  #if USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS
>> Do we still use USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS? I think its good enough. with pgd's
>> we are likely to use the same locks and the split nature may not be really
>> split.
>>
> 
> Sorry Balbir, did not get what you asked. Can you please elaborate on
> this ?
> 

What I meant is that do we need SPLIT_PUD_PTLOCKS for example? I don't think we do

Balbir