Re: [PATCH 01/13] devpts: Teach /dev/ptmx to find the associated devpts via path lookup

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 9, 2016 5:45 PM, "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> What we *do* want to do, though, is to prevent the following:
>>
>> I don't see the point. Why do you bring up this insane scenario that nobody
>> can possibly care about?
>>
>> So you actually have any reason to believe somebody does that?
>>
>> I already asked about that earlier, and the silence was deafening.
>
> I have no idea, but I'm generally uncomfortable with magical things
> that bypass normal security policy.
>
> That being said, here's an idea for fixing this, at least in the long
> run.  Add a new devpts mount option "no_ptmx_redirect" that turns off
> this behavior for the super in question.  That is, opening /dev/ptmx
> if "pts/ptmx" points to something with no_ptmx_redirect set will fail.
> Distros shipping new kernels could be encouraged to (finally!) make
> /dev/ptmx a symlink and set this option.
>
> We just might be able to get away with spelling that option "newinstance".

Linus, you said that people who want to protect their pts should deny
execute.  So I set it up:

# ls -l
total 0
crw-------. 1 root root 5, 2 Apr 12 10:38 ptmx
drwx------. 2 root root    0 Apr  2 11:35 pts

$ unshare -urm
# ls -l
total 0
crw-------. 1 nfsnobody nfsnobody 5, 2 Apr 12 10:38 ptmx
drwx------. 2 nfsnobody nfsnobody    0 Apr  2 11:35 pts
# mount --bind /dev/ptmx ptmx
# ls -l
total 0
crw-rw-rw-. 1 nfsnobody nfsnobody 5, 2 Apr 12 10:42 ptmx
drwx------. 2 nfsnobody nfsnobody    0 Apr  2 11:35 pts

And there goes your protection.  So the whole /dev directory would
have to deny execute to protect against this.

But I think that gating this on mount options might be fine.  If
devpts is mounted with newinstance, then /dev/ptmx *already doesn't
work for it*, right?  So can we just say that the magic ptmx ->
pts/ptmx redirect doesn't work if the pts filesystem in question is
mounted with newinstance?

--Andy