Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/pt: Don't die on VMXON

[Ingo Molnar]

* Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> @@ -3144,6 +3146,8 @@ static void vmclear_local_loaded_vmcss(void)
> >>  static void kvm_cpu_vmxoff(void)
> >>  {
> >>  	asm volatile (__ex(ASM_VMX_VMXOFF) : : : "cc");
> >> +
> >> +	intel_pt_vmx(0);
> >>  }
> >
> > Yeah so the name intel_pt_vmx() is pretty information-free because it has no verb, 
> > only nouns - please name new functions descriptively to after what they do!
> 
> I do agree that it can use a better name (and this is a second attempt
> already).
> 
> > Something like intel_pt_set_vmx_state() or so?
> 
> Hmm how about intel_pt_handle_vmx()? Ideally, akin to the VMXON/VMXOFF insns, 
> this could be two functions (intel_pt_handle_vmx{on,off}()) if the global 
> namespace can take it.

Sure, intel_pt_handle_vmx(0/1) sounds good too. I wouldn't split it into two 
functions ...

Thanks,

	Ingo