Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mmc: pwrseq: convert to proper platform device

From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Thu Apr 14 2016 - 05:33:49 EST


On 13 April 2016 at 19:54, Srinivas Kandagatla
<srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> simple-pwrseq and emmc-pwrseq drivers rely on platform_device
> structure from of_find_device_by_node(), this works mostly. But, as there
> is no driver associated with this devices, cases like default/init pinctrl
> setup would never be performed by pwrseq. This becomes problem when the
> gpios used in pwrseq require pinctrl setup.
>
> Currently most of the common pinctrl setup is done in
> drivers/base/pinctrl.c by pinctrl_bind_pins().
>
> There are two ways to solve this issue on either convert pwrseq drivers
> to a proper platform drivers or copy the exact code from
> pcintrl_bind_pins(). I prefer converting pwrseq to proper drivers so that
> other cases like setting up clks/parents from dt would also be possible.
>

[...]

>
> int mmc_pwrseq_alloc(struct mmc_host *host)
> {
> - struct platform_device *pdev;
> struct device_node *np;
> - struct mmc_pwrseq_match *match;
> - struct mmc_pwrseq *pwrseq;
> - int ret = 0;
> + struct mmc_pwrseq *p, *pwrseq = NULL;
>
> np = of_parse_phandle(host->parent->of_node, "mmc-pwrseq", 0);
> if (!np)
> return 0;
>
> - pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> - if (!pdev) {
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto err;
> + mutex_lock(&pwrseq_list_mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry(p, &pwrseq_list, pwrseq_node) {
> + if (p->dev->of_node == np) {
> + pwrseq = p;
> + try_module_get(pwrseq->owner);

This can fail, so please add error handling.

> + host->pwrseq = pwrseq;
> + break;
> + }
> }
>
> - match = mmc_pwrseq_find(np);
> - if (IS_ERR(match)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(match);
> - goto err;
> - }
> + of_node_put(np);
> + mutex_unlock(&pwrseq_list_mutex);
>
> - pwrseq = match->alloc(host, &pdev->dev);
> - if (IS_ERR(pwrseq)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(pwrseq);
> - goto err;
> - }
> + if (!pwrseq)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> - host->pwrseq = pwrseq;
> dev_info(host->parent, "allocated mmc-pwrseq\n");
>
> -err:
> - of_node_put(np);
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>

Besides the minor thing above, this looks good to me!

Kind regards
Uffe