Re: [PATCH 0/2] da8xx clocks (was part of "da8xx USB clocks")

[David Lechner]

On 04/15/2016 01:36 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:

> No, I had commented about removing the new clk init function you had
> introduced so I was waiting for that to be addressed. I was okay with
> the second patch in this series, but did not push it to master branch as
> it depends on clk init movement and breaks boot if applied independently.

Got it. The second patch disappeared when I rebased, so it threw me off.