Re: [PATCH] IMA: add INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS dependency
From: Mimi Zohar
Date: Mon Apr 18 2016 - 19:01:04 EST
Hi Arnd,
On Sat, 2016-04-16 at 22:33 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly added CONFIG_IMA_KEYRINGS_PERMIT_SIGNED_BY_BUILTIN_OR_SECONDARY
> option only makes sense in combination with INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS,
> otherwise we get a build error:
>
> warning: (IMA_KEYRINGS_PERMIT_SIGNED_BY_BUILTIN_OR_SECONDARY) selects INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING which has unmet direct dependencies (INTEGRITY && SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING && INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS)
> security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c: In function 'evm_load_x509':
> security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:494:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'integrity_load_x509'
> rc = integrity_load_x509(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_EVM, CONFIG_EVM_X509_PATH);
>
> This adds a Kconfig dependency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 9e1bbe8b8992 ("IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok")
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
> index aab9b0a53edf..5487827fa86c 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ config IMA_KEYRINGS_PERMIT_SIGNED_BY_BUILTIN_OR_SECONDARY
> bool "Permit keys validly signed by a built-in or secondary CA cert (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> depends on SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING
> depends on SECONDARY_TRUSTED_KEYRING
> + depends on INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS
> select INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING
> default n
> help
Good catch! Thank you for reporting the problem.
Enabling this Kconfig option only makes sense if IMA_TRUSTED_KEYRING is
enabled. I think adding that dependency will resolve the build issues.
Mimi