Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: devicetree: Clean up gpio-keys example

From: Rob Herring
Date: Tue Apr 19 2016 - 18:14:07 EST


On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:53:29PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Drop #address-cells and #size-cells, which are not required by the
> gpio-keys binding documentation, as button sub-nodes are not devices.
>
> Rename sub-nodes to avoid new dtc unit address warnings when copied.
>
> While at it, adopt the dashes convention for the node name.
>
> Reported-by: Julien Chauveau <chauveau.julien@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Julien Chauveau <chauveau.julien@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks.

Rob

> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> * Changed node name from underscore to dash
> * Inserted white lines
> * Renamed sub-nodes (Geert, Julien)
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
> index 21641236c095..a94940481e55 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
> @@ -32,17 +32,17 @@ Optional subnode-properties:
>
> Example nodes:
>
> - gpio_keys {
> + gpio-keys {
> compatible = "gpio-keys";
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> - #size-cells = <0>;
> autorepeat;
> - button@21 {
> +
> + up {
> label = "GPIO Key UP";
> linux,code = <103>;
> gpios = <&gpio1 0 1>;
> };
> - button@22 {
> +
> + down {
> label = "GPIO Key DOWN";
> linux,code = <108>;
> interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> --
> 2.6.2
>