Re: Does anyone care about a race free ptsname?

[Linus Torvalds]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I will take a look in a minute.   Before I do that I want to mention
> why I care about /dev/pts/ptmx.
>
> There is a posix function that is widely used called ptsname.  It's
> function is to take a master file descriptor and returns the path to the
> slave.
>
> All we have in the kernel to support ptsname is an ioctl TIOCGPTN that
> returns the pty number in the appropriate instance of devpts.

Don't bother with that completely mis-designed interface.It's crap.

So we'll keep it working for legacy models, but the whole "return an
integer index" is just pure shit. It's not worth worrying about.

We can (and probably should) just introduce a new ioctl or even a
system call that just does the sane thing and returns the pathname
from the kernel.

But for legacy reasons, we will continue to just return that silly
integer, and it will continue to work - if you use /dev/pts/<n>.

And if you mount devpts anywhere else, or have some other setup, that
interface *cannot* work. More importantly, it's not even worth
worrying about.

                Linus