RE: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: DT: vdma: Add clock support for vdma
From: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
Date: Wed Apr 20 2016 - 04:39:56 EST
Hi Shubhrajyoti,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shubhrajyoti Datta [mailto:shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 1:30 PM
> To: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appanad@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>;
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>; Ian Campbell
> <ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Michal
> Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx; dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx; Appana Durga Kedareswara
> Rao <appanad@xxxxxxxxxx>; Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@xxxxxxxxx>;
> Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> luis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Anirudha Sarangi <anirudh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Punnaiah
> Choudary Kalluri <punnaia@xxxxxxxxxx>; dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: DT: vdma: Add clock support for vdma
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Kedareswara rao Appana
> <appana.durga.rao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This patch updates the binding doc with clock description for vdma.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kedareswara rao Appana <appanad@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/xilinx/xilinx_vdma.txt | 6
> > ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/xilinx/xilinx_vdma.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/xilinx/xilinx_vdma.txt
> > index fcc2b65..e1c9019 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/xilinx/xilinx_vdma.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/xilinx/xilinx_vdma.txt
> > @@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ Required properties:
> > - dma-channel child node: Should have at least one channel and can have up
> to
> > two channels per device. This node specifies the properties of each
> > DMA channel (see child node properties below).
> > +- clocks: Input clock specifier. Refer to common clock bindings.
> > +- clock-names: List of input clocks "axi_clk", "tx_clk", "txs_clk" (list of input
> > + cloks may vary based on the ip configuration. see clock bindings
> > + for more info).
> >
> > Required properties for VDMA:
> > - xlnx,num-fstores: Should be the number of framebuffers as configured in
> h/w.
> > @@ -60,6 +64,8 @@ axi_vdma_0: axivdma@40030000 {
> > xlnx,num-fstores = <0x8>;
> > xlnx,flush-fsync = <0x1>;
> > xlnx,addrwidth = <0x20>;
> > + clocks = <&clk 0>, <&clk 1>, <&clk 2>;
> > + clock-names = "axi_clk", "tx_clk", "txs_clk";
>
> the module has
> s_axi_lite_aclk Clock I AXI VDMA AXI4-Lite interface clock m_axi_mm2s_aclk
> Clock I AXI VDMA MM2S clock m_axi_s2mm_aclk Clock I AXI VDMA S2MM clock
> m_axis_mm2s_aclk Clock I AXI VDMA MM2S AXIS clock s_axis_s2mm_aclk
> Clock I AXI VDMA S2MM AXIS clock
>
> I think a partial support is not wrong.
It is not partial support the driver is supporting all the clocks available in the IP (please refer the patch 2 in the series).
In the example I just putted clock names for TX path I mean when the IP is configured only with one channel.
Will update the clock-names example with the all the supported clocks in the next version.
> however we should keep the names same as the TRM.
Why?? Why can't we use simple convenient names that refers to equivalent clocks of h/w
I mean I used axi_clk instead of s_axi_lite_aclk,
Used tx_clk instead of m_axi_mm2s_aclk,
Used txs_clk instead of m_axis_mm2s_aclk.
If it mandatory to use names as the TRM please let me know will update the same v2...
Regards,
Kedar.
>
>
> > dma-channel@40030000 {
> > compatible = "xlnx,axi-vdma-mm2s-channel";
> > interrupts = < 0 54 4 >;
> > --
> > 2.1.2
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel