RE: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: DT: vdma: Add clock support for vdma
From: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
Date: Wed Apr 20 2016 - 07:30:31 EST
Hi Lars,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars-Peter Clausen [mailto:lars@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 4:45 PM
> To: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appanad@xxxxxxxxxx>; Shubhrajyoti Datta
> <shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>;
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>; Ian Campbell
> <ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Michal
> Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx; dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx; Moritz Fischer
> <moritz.fischer@xxxxxxxxx>; Laurent Pinchart
> <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; luis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Anirudha
> Sarangi <anirudh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri
> <punnaia@xxxxxxxxxx>; dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: DT: vdma: Add clock support for vdma
>
> On 04/20/2016 10:39 AM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
> [...]
> >> however we should keep the names same as the TRM.
> >
> > Why?? Why can't we use simple convenient names that refers to
> > equivalent clocks of h/w
>
> Because it is confusing. If you use the same name it's very straight forward to
> understand which clock is being referred to. That's not the case if you come up
> with random new names.
Ok will fix in the v2...
Regards,
Kedar.