Re: stable-security kernel updates

[Sasha Levin]

Hey Willy,

On 04/21/2016 03:11 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> This illustrates exactly what I suspected would happen because that's the
> same trouble we all face when picking backports for our respective trees
> except that since the selection barrier is much higher here, lots of
> important ones will be missing

Right. I fully agree that there will be important security commits that'll
get missed, whether because they were missed in the stable selection or
the stable-security selection.

I'd like to point out again that updating the entire stable tree is the
preferable way to patch against security (and non-security) issues. The
stable-security tree is a best-effort solution to provide a stop-gap in
between said stable tree updates.


Thanks,
Sasha