Re: [PATCH 6/8] mfd: Add STMPE1600 support

From: Patrice Chotard
Date: Thu Apr 21 2016 - 09:52:22 EST




On 04/20/2016 04:43 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:18 PM, <patrice.chotard@xxxxxx> wrote:

From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@xxxxxx>

STMPE1600 is a 16-bit port expander.
Datasheet is available here :
http://www2.st.com/content/st_com/en/products/interfaces-and-transceivers/
i-o-expanders-and-level-translators/i-o-expanders/stmpe1600.html

As STMPE1600's SYS_CTRL register has the same layout as
STMPE801 variant, unify STMPExxx_REG_SYS_CTRL_RESET/INT_EN/INT_HI
bit masks to more generic STMPE_SYS_CTRL_RESET/INT_EN/INT_HI

Signed-off-by: Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@xxxxxx>
(...)
#define STMPE_SYS_CTRL_RESET (1 << 7)
+#define STMPE_SYS_CTRL_INT_EN (1 << 2)
+#define STMPE_SYS_CTRL_INT_HI (1 << 0)

/*
* STMPE801
@@ -121,10 +123,6 @@ int stmpe_remove(struct stmpe *stmpe);
#define STMPE801_REG_GPIO_SET_PIN 0x11
#define STMPE801_REG_GPIO_DIR 0x12

-#define STMPE801_REG_SYS_CTRL_RESET (1 << 7)
-#define STMPE801_REG_SYS_CTRL_INT_EN (1 << 2)
-#define STMPE801_REG_SYS_CTRL_INT_HI (1 << 0)
This looks like unrelated cleanups?
Should this be in the reset enablement patch?
(It's OK with me though.)

Not completely unrelated as STMPE801 and STMPE1600 use the same SYS_CTRL register layout.
But nevertheless i will put this fix in a separate patch.

Thanks

Patrice


With that fixed:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Hi