Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64

[Hanjun Guo]

Hi Will, David,

On 2016/4/26 0:47, David Daney wrote:
> On 04/25/2016 04:13 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:40:25PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> > > From: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Based on v16 of device-tree NUMA patch set for arm64 [1],this patch
> > > set introduce the ACPI based configuration to provide NUMA
> > > information.
> > >
> > > ACPI 5.1 already introduced NUMA support for ARM64, which can get the
> > > NUMA domain information from SRAT and SLIT table, so parse those two
> > > tables to get mappings from cpu/mem to numa node configuration and
> > > system locality.
> >
> > Whilst I've queued the main NUMA series for arm64, I'd really like to
> > see more movement on the generic header file cleanups that you posted
> > separately:
> >
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456358528-24213-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx
>
> FWIW:  Those patches should still apply.  I am carrying them in my
> development trees, and have not changed them in any way.
>
> > Given that this ACPI series already requires some significant cross-arch
> > interaction (which is actually good!), perhaps extending the clean-up
> > patches to encompass some of the ACPI bits might make sense, and we can
> > get that queued as a pre-requisite.
>
> The cleanup patches you mention above are really independent of the ACPI
> things.  I have applied them both before and after the ACPI patches, and
> both seem to work.  With a quick perusal of the ACPI patches nothing
> jumps out at me as being a candidate for inclusion in the header file
> cleanup series.

I agree. My patch set is ACPI related enablement, cleanups and
consolidations, it would be good to merge as a single patch set
as it's self-contained.

Thanks
Hanjun