[PATCH v2 10/10] gpio: stmpe: Add STMPE1600 support

From: patrice.chotard
Date: Thu Apr 28 2016 - 08:14:33 EST


From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@xxxxxx>

The particularities of this variant are:
- GPIO_XXX_LSB and GPIO_XXX_MSB memory locations are inverted compared
to other variants.
- There is no Edge detection, Rising Edge and Falling Edge registers.
- IRQ flags are cleared when read, no need to write in Status register.

Signed-off-by: Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
index 6d6d76a..32c5a72 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
@@ -128,8 +128,9 @@ static int stmpe_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
if (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)
return -EINVAL;

- /* STMPE801 doesn't have RE and FE registers */
- if (stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE801)
+ /* STMPE801 and STMPE 1600 don't have RE and FE registers */
+ if (stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE801 ||
+ stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600)
return 0;

if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
@@ -173,9 +174,10 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *d)
int i, j;

for (i = 0; i < CACHE_NR_REGS; i++) {
- /* STMPE801 doesn't have RE and FE registers */
- if ((stmpe->partnum == STMPE801) &&
- (i != REG_IE))
+ /* STMPE801 and STMPE1600 don't have RE and FE registers */
+ if ((stmpe->partnum == STMPE801 ||
+ stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) &&
+ (i != REG_IE))
continue;

for (j = 0; j < num_banks; j++) {
@@ -208,11 +210,21 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+ struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
int offset = d->hwirq;
int regoffset = offset / 8;
int mask = 1 << (offset % 8);

stmpe_gpio->regs[REG_IE][regoffset] |= mask;
+
+ /*
+ * STMPE1600 workaround: to be able to get IRQ from pins,
+ * a read must be done on GPMR register, or a write in
+ * GPSR or GPCR registers
+ */
+ if (stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600)
+ stmpe_reg_read(stmpe,
+ stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPMR_LSB + regoffset]);
}

static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s,
@@ -285,6 +297,7 @@ static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s,
fall = !!(ret & mask);

case STMPE801:
+ case STMPE1600:
irqen_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_LSB + bank];
break;

@@ -331,18 +344,32 @@ static irqreturn_t stmpe_gpio_irq(int irq, void *dev)
{
struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = dev;
struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
- u8 statmsbreg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_ISGPIOR_MSB];
+ u8 statmsbreg;
int num_banks = DIV_ROUND_UP(stmpe->num_gpios, 8);
u8 status[num_banks];
int ret;
int i;

+ /*
+ * the stmpe_block_read() call below, imposes to set statmsbreg
+ * with the register located at the lowest address. As STMPE1600
+ * variant is the only one which respect registers address's order
+ * (LSB regs located at lowest address than MSB ones) whereas all
+ * the others have a registers layout with MSB located before the
+ * LSB regs.
+ */
+ if (stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600)
+ statmsbreg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_ISGPIOR_LSB];
+ else
+ statmsbreg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_ISGPIOR_MSB];
+
ret = stmpe_block_read(stmpe, statmsbreg, num_banks, status);
if (ret < 0)
return IRQ_NONE;

for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
- int bank = num_banks - i - 1;
+ int bank = (stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) ? i :
+ num_banks - i - 1;
unsigned int enabled = stmpe_gpio->regs[REG_IE][bank];
unsigned int stat = status[i];

@@ -362,10 +389,11 @@ static irqreturn_t stmpe_gpio_irq(int irq, void *dev)

/*
* interrupt status register write has no effect on
- * 801 and 1801, bits are cleared when read.
- * Edge detect register is not present on 801 and 1801
+ * 801/1801/1600, bits are cleared when read.
+ * Edge detect register is not present on 801/1600/1801
*/
- if (stmpe->partnum != STMPE801 || stmpe->partnum != STMPE1801) {
+ if (stmpe->partnum != STMPE801 || stmpe->partnum != STMPE1600 ||
+ stmpe->partnum != STMPE1801) {
stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, statmsbreg + i, status[i]);
stmpe_reg_write(stmpe,
stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPEDR_LSB + i],
--
1.9.1