Re: [PATCH V11 4/6] pinctrl: max77620: add pincontrol driver for MAX77620/MAX20024

[Laxman Dewangan]

Hi Lee,

On Thursday 28 April 2016 03:28 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> MAXIM Semiconductor's PMIC, MAX77620/MAX20024 has 8 GPIO pins
> which also act as the special function in alternate mode. Also
> there is configuration like push-pull, open drain, FPS timing
> etc for these pins.
>
> Add pin control driver to configure these parameters through
> pin control APIs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

It seems there is some mismatches on kernel-next and the mfd/for-next 
for one of patch for generic function name.

/**
2016-04-01    pinctrl: Rename pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map to 
pinctrl_utils_free_map    Irina Tirdea    1    -1/+1

d32f7fd3bbc32732b094d938b95169521503a9fb (patch)

pinctrl: Rename pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map to pinctrl_utils_free_map

Rename pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map to pinctrl_utils_free_map, since
it does not depend on device tree despite the current name. This
will enforce a consistent naming in pinctr-utils.c and will make
it clear it can be called from outside device tree (e.g. from
ACPI handling code).
**/

But this is not there in MFD sub system.

In mfd tree
.dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map,

In kernel next
.dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,


 I used APIs from the kernel-next.
> +static const struct pinctrl_ops max77620_pinctrl_ops = {
> +	.get_groups_count = max77620_pinctrl_get_groups_count,
> +	.get_group_name = max77620_pinctrl_get_group_name,
> +	.get_group_pins = max77620_pinctrl_get_group_pins,
> +	.dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin,
> +	.dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,
> +};


If you see any issue on this patch, please drop this patch and we will 
fix this later once the renamed change available all the places.