Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove()
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Apr 28 2016 - 13:45:26 EST
* Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 9:47 AM, One Thousand Gnomes
> <gnomes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > O> For example, this is what I've got currently:
> >>
> >> /* Detect and warn about potential overlaps. */
> >> void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n)
> >> {
> >> if (dest > src && dest - src < n)
> >> warn("Potentially unsafe overlapping memcpy detected!");
> >> return __memcpy(dest, src, n);
> >> }
> >>
> >> Does that seem okay? If so, I'll send the patch...
> >
> > Probably useful for debug, but instead of relying on __memcpy
> > happening to handle overlaps - which isn't portable you could instead
> > debug all platforms by doing
> >
> > if (...) {
> > warn(...)
> > memmove()
> > } else
> > __memcpy
> >
>
> Yeah, that's kind of where we started (but without the warning). I
> prefer this, since we don't run the risk of MAYBE breaking. We warn,
> but we remain safe.
Works for me!
Thanks,
Ingo