Re: [PATCH 1/2] zsmalloc: require GFP in zs_malloc()
From: Minchan Kim
Date: Fri Apr 29 2016 - 01:44:48 EST
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:17:09AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Pass GFP flags to zs_malloc() instead of using a fixed set
> (supplied during pool creation), so we can be more flexible,
> but, more importantly, this will be need to switch zram to
> per-cpu compression streams.
>
> Apart from that, this also align zs_malloc() interface with
> zspool/zbud.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/zsmalloc.h | 2 +-
> mm/zsmalloc.c | 15 ++++++---------
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index 370c2f7..9030992 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
> src = uncmem;
> }
>
> - handle = zs_malloc(meta->mem_pool, clen);
> + handle = zs_malloc(meta->mem_pool, clen, GFP_NOIO | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
> if (!handle) {
> pr_err("Error allocating memory for compressed page: %u, size=%zu\n",
> index, clen);
> diff --git a/include/linux/zsmalloc.h b/include/linux/zsmalloc.h
> index 34eb160..6d89f8b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/zsmalloc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/zsmalloc.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct zs_pool;
> struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const char *name, gfp_t flags);
> void zs_destroy_pool(struct zs_pool *pool);
>
> -unsigned long zs_malloc(struct zs_pool *pool, size_t size);
> +unsigned long zs_malloc(struct zs_pool *pool, size_t size, gfp_t flags);
> void zs_free(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned long obj);
>
> void *zs_map_object(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned long handle,
> diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> index a0890e9..2c22aff 100644
> --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,6 @@ struct zs_pool {
> struct size_class **size_class;
> struct kmem_cache *handle_cachep;
>
> - gfp_t flags; /* allocation flags used when growing pool */
> atomic_long_t pages_allocated;
>
> struct zs_pool_stats stats;
> @@ -295,10 +294,10 @@ static void destroy_handle_cache(struct zs_pool *pool)
> kmem_cache_destroy(pool->handle_cachep);
> }
>
> -static unsigned long alloc_handle(struct zs_pool *pool)
> +static unsigned long alloc_handle(struct zs_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp)
> {
> return (unsigned long)kmem_cache_alloc(pool->handle_cachep,
> - pool->flags & ~__GFP_HIGHMEM);
> + gfp & ~__GFP_HIGHMEM);
> }
>
> static void free_handle(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
> @@ -335,7 +334,7 @@ static void zs_zpool_destroy(void *pool)
> static int zs_zpool_malloc(void *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
> unsigned long *handle)
> {
> - *handle = zs_malloc(pool, size);
> + *handle = zs_malloc(pool, size, gfp);
> return *handle ? 0 : -1;
> }
> static void zs_zpool_free(void *pool, unsigned long handle)
> @@ -1391,7 +1390,7 @@ static unsigned long obj_malloc(struct size_class *class,
> * otherwise 0.
> * Allocation requests with size > ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE will fail.
> */
> -unsigned long zs_malloc(struct zs_pool *pool, size_t size)
> +unsigned long zs_malloc(struct zs_pool *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
> {
> unsigned long handle, obj;
> struct size_class *class;
> @@ -1400,7 +1399,7 @@ unsigned long zs_malloc(struct zs_pool *pool, size_t size)
> if (unlikely(!size || size > ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE))
> return 0;
>
> - handle = alloc_handle(pool);
> + handle = alloc_handle(pool, gfp);
> if (!handle)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -1413,7 +1412,7 @@ unsigned long zs_malloc(struct zs_pool *pool, size_t size)
>
> if (!first_page) {
> spin_unlock(&class->lock);
> - first_page = alloc_zspage(class, pool->flags);
> + first_page = alloc_zspage(class, gfp);
> if (unlikely(!first_page)) {
> free_handle(pool, handle);
> return 0;
> @@ -1945,8 +1944,6 @@ struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const char *name, gfp_t flags)
So, we can remove flags parameter passing and comment about that.
Other than that,
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>