Re: [PATCH 0/4] Decouple X86_32 dependency from the ISA Kconfig option

From: William Breathitt Gray
Date: Sun May 01 2016 - 12:19:55 EST

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:18:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:48:42AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >Ah, ok, so it's for enabling real hardware, not just a cleanup, right? You might
>> >want to put that info into the boilerplate mail or so.
>> >
>> >I'm perfectly fine with all the patches that touch x86 code:
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> >I suppose you'd like to have these in the driver tree, all in one place?
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> > Ingo
>> Ah yes, in retrospect I should have made it clear that this was for
>> supporting hardware rather than simply code cleanup. That was an
>> oversight on my part not to have made it more explicit.
>> Introducing everything to the driver tree would be most convenient, thus
>> allowing me to quickly release my subsequent patches which will be
>> rebased on top of these.
>Ok, I can take these.
>greg k-h

Forgive me for probing again; what is that status of this patchset? I'm
anxious to see them accepted to prevent the regression introduced by the
ISA_BUS configuration option from appearing in the next merge window.

Many thanks,

William Breathitt Gray