Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER()
From: Alex Deucher
Date: Mon May 02 2016 - 10:46:59 EST
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Christian KÃnig
<christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 30.04.2016 um 21:00 schrieb Muhammad Falak R Wani:
>>
>> The rcu_assign_pointer() ensures that the initialization of a structure
>> is carried out before storing a pointer to that structre. It is always
>> safe to use RCU_INIT_POINTER() to NULL a pointer, instead of
>> rcu_assign_pointer().
>> This results in slightly smaller/faster code.
>
>
> Thanks for the detailed explanation, I was already wondering what the
> difference is between the two.
>
>>
>> The following semantic patch was used:
>> <smpl>
>>
>> @@
>> @@
>>
>> - rcu_assign_pointer
>> + RCU_INIT_POINTER
>> (..., NULL)
>>
>> </smpl>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Christian KÃnig <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Applied. thanks!
Alex
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
>> index d81f1f4..4500ff1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
>> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ void amdgpu_fence_process(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
>> /* There is always exactly one thread signaling this fence
>> slot */
>> fence = rcu_dereference_protected(*ptr, 1);
>> - rcu_assign_pointer(*ptr, NULL);
>> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(*ptr, NULL);
>> BUG_ON(!fence);
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel