RE: [PATCH V3 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements

From: Nalla, Ravikanth
Date: Mon May 02 2016 - 13:44:36 EST

Next message: Waiman Long: "Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] ext4: Improve parallel I/O performance on NVDIMM"
Previous message: Moritz Fischer: "[PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for Micron n25q016a"
Next in thread: Sinan Kaya: "Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----Original Message-----
From: Sinan Kaya [mailto:okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 12:30 AM
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; cov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nalla, Ravikanth <ravikanth.nalla@xxxxxxx>; lenb@xxxxxxxxxx; K, Harish (MCOU/UPEL) <harish.k@xxxxxxx>; Reghunandanan, Ashwin (STSD) <ashwin.reghunandanan@xxxxxxx>; bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements

On 4/26/2016 2:36 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 01:36:53PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> Code has been redesigned to calculate penalty requirements on the
>> fly. This significantly simplifies the implementation and removes
>> some of the init calls from x86 architecture.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> For all four patches:
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Thanks, can the HPE developers in CC test the series in order to avoid another revert?

I'm facing below errors while applying these patches on mainline kernel for verification. Please check and let me know what is the issue or if I'm
missing anything. I use outlook for mail and I copied your mail formatted patches into each individual file manually and converted these files into
unix format (using dos2unix cmd) and when trying to apply with cmd "patch -p1 patch1.patch" / "git apply patch1.patch" i see
below errors. I'm getting similar errors for remaining patches too and also "checkpatch.pl" looks to be throwing errors. Hence I'm not able to
verify your changes.

linux]# dos2unix patch1.patch
dos2unix: converting file patch1.patch to Unix format ...
linux]# patch -p1 < patch1.patch
patching file drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
patch: **** malformed patch at line 99: @@ -547,12 +601,12 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct acpi_pci_link *link)
linux]# git apply patch1.patch
fatal: corrupt patch at line 99

"checkpatch.pl" errors:
-----------------------------
linux]# ./scripts/checkpatch.pl patch1.patch
ERROR: open brace '{' following function declarations go on the next line
#44: FILE: drivers/acpi/pci_link.c:470:
+static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq) {

ERROR: open brace '{' following function declarations go on the next line
#72: FILE: drivers/acpi/pci_link.c:498:
+static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq) {

ERROR: patch seems to be corrupt (line wrapped?)
#173: FILE: drivers/acpi/pci_link.c:889:
1.8.2.1

total: 3 errors, 0 warnings, 144 lines checked

patch1.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 97
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c index
>> ededa90..cc0ba16 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/acpi.h>
>> +#include <linux/irq.h>
>>
>> #include "internal.h"
>>
>> @@ -440,7 +441,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi_pci_link *link, int irq)
>> #define ACPI_MAX_IRQS 256
>> #define ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQ 16
>>
>> -#define PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE (0)
>> #define PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE (16*16)
>> #define PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING (16*16*16)
>> #define PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_TYPICAL (16*16*16*16)
>> @@ -457,9 +457,9 @@ static int acpi_irq_penalty[ACPI_MAX_IRQS] = {
>> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_TYPICAL, /* IRQ6 */
>> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_TYPICAL, /* IRQ7 parallel, spurious */
>> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_TYPICAL, /* IRQ8 rtc, sometimes */
>> - PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE, /* IRQ9 PCI, often acpi */
>> - PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE, /* IRQ10 PCI */
>> - PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE, /* IRQ11 PCI */
>> + 0, /* IRQ9 PCI, often acpi */
>> + 0, /* IRQ10 PCI */
>> + 0, /* IRQ11 PCI */
>> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED, /* IRQ12 mouse */
>> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED, /* IRQ13 fpe, sometimes */
>> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED, /* IRQ14 ide0 */
>> @@ -467,6 +467,60 @@ static int acpi_irq_penalty[ACPI_MAX_IRQS] = {
>> /* >IRQ15 */
>> };
>>
>> +static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq) {
>> + struct acpi_pci_link *link;
>> + int penalty = 0;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(link, &acpi_link_list, list) {
>> + /*
>> + * If a link is active, penalize its IRQ heavily
>> + * so we try to choose a different IRQ.
>> + */
>> + if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
>> + penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
>> + else {
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If a link is inactive, penalize the IRQs it
>> + * might use, but not as severely.
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++)
>> + if (link->irq.possible[i] == irq)
>> + penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE /
>> + link->irq.possible_count;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return penalty;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq) {
>> + int penalty = 0;
>> +
>> + if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQ)
>> + penalty += acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
>> + * with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
>> + * use for PCI IRQs.
>> + */
>> + if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
>> + u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
>> +
>> + if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
>> + penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
>> + else
>> + penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
>> + }
>> +
>> + penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
>> + return penalty;
>> +}
>> +
>> int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void) {
>> struct acpi_pci_link *link;
>> @@ -547,12 +601,12 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct acpi_pci_link *link)
>> * the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15.
>> */
>> for (i = (link->irq.possible_count - 1); i >= 0; i--) {
>> - if (acpi_irq_penalty[irq] >
>> - acpi_irq_penalty[link->irq.possible[i]])
>> + if (acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) >
>> + acpi_irq_get_penalty(link->irq.possible[i]))
>> irq = link->irq.possible[i];
>> }
>> }
>> - if (acpi_irq_penalty[irq] >= PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS) {
>> + if (acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) >= PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS) {
>> printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "No IRQ available for %s [%s]. "
>> "Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off\n",
>> acpi_device_name(link->device), @@ -568,7 +622,6 @@ static
>> int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct acpi_pci_link *link)
>> acpi_device_bid(link->device));
>> return -ENODEV;
>> } else {
>> - acpi_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
>> printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "%s [%s] enabled at IRQ %d\n",
>> acpi_device_name(link->device),
>> acpi_device_bid(link->device), link->irq.active); @@ -800,9
>> +853,10 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>> continue;
>>
>> if (used)
>> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
>> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
>> + PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
>> else
>> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE;
>> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] = 0;
>>
>> if (retval != 2) /* no next number */
>> break;
>> @@ -819,34 +873,19 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>> */
>> void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active) {
>> - if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty)) {
>> - if (active)
>> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
>> - else
>> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
>> - }
>> + if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty))
>> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
>> + active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
>> }
>>
>> bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq) {
>> return irq >= 0 && (irq >= ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty) ||
>> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
>> + acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes
>> conflict with
>> - * PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
>> use for
>> - * PCI IRQs.
>> - */
>> void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity) {
>> - if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty)) {
>> - if (trigger != ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL ||
>> - polarity != ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
>> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
>> - else
>> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
>> - }
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> --
>> 1.8.2.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci"
>> in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo
>> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Next message: Waiman Long: "Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] ext4: Improve parallel I/O performance on NVDIMM"
Previous message: Moritz Fischer: "[PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for Micron n25q016a"
Next in thread: Sinan Kaya: "Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]