Re: [PATCH 2/2] zram: user per-cpu compression streams

[Minchan Kim]

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 02:57:15PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (05/03/16 14:40), Minchan Kim wrote:
> [..]
> > > At least, we need sanity check code, still?
> > > Otherwise, user can echo "garbage" > /sys/xxx/max_comp_stream" and then
> > > cat /sys/xxx/max_comp_stream returns num_online_cpus.
> > 
> > One more thing,
> > 
> > User:
> > echo 4 > /sys/xxx/max_comp_stream"
> > cat /sys/xxx/max_comp_streams
> > 8
> 
> sure, it can also be
> 
> cat /sys/xxx/max_comp_streams
> 5
> cat /sys/xxx/max_comp_streams
> 6
> cat /sys/xxx/max_comp_streams
> 7
> cat /sys/xxx/max_comp_streams
> 3
> 
> depending on the availability of CPUs. but why would user space
> constantly check max_comp_streams?
> 
> > which is rather weird?
> > 
> > We should keep user's value and return it to user although it's techically
> > lying. IMO, it would be best way to prevent confusing for user until we
> > removes max_comp_streams finally.
> 
> well, I preferred to show the actual state of the device. besides,
> does anyone really do
> 
> 	write buffer to file
> 	if (success)
> 		read from file and compare with the buffer
> 
> ?
> 

Okay, I want to go with your approach!
Could you update zram.txt to reflect it?

Thanks.