Re: [PATCH RFC] Watchdog: sbsa_gwdt: Enhance timeout range
From: Timur Tabi
Date: Tue May 03 2016 - 11:07:55 EST
Pratyush Anand wrote:
In fact after supporting max_hw_heartbeat_ms, there should be no change for
action=0 functionally. However, we would still need some changes for action=1.
IMHO, action=1 is more of a debugging option, and not something that
would be used normally. I would need to see some evidence that real
users want to have action=1 and a longer timeout.
I've never been a fan of the action=1 option, and I'm certainly not keen
any patches that make action=1 more complicated than it already is.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum, a Linux Foundation collaborative project.