Re: [RFC v2 3/7] firmware: port built-in section to linker table

From: Luis R. Rodriguez
Date: Tue May 03 2016 - 13:12:02 EST

Next message: Eric Anholt: "Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event."
Previous message: Luis R. Rodriguez: "Re: [RFC v2 3/7] firmware: port built-in section to linker table"
In reply to: Luis R. Rodriguez: "Re: [RFC v2 3/7] firmware: port built-in section to linker table"
Next in thread: Kees Cook: "Re: [RFC v2 3/7] firmware: port built-in section to linker table"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> or it was decided

Sorry I meant to say: 'or _why_ it was decided to not use initramfs on
these systems?'

Luis

Next message: Eric Anholt: "Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event."
Previous message: Luis R. Rodriguez: "Re: [RFC v2 3/7] firmware: port built-in section to linker table"
In reply to: Luis R. Rodriguez: "Re: [RFC v2 3/7] firmware: port built-in section to linker table"
Next in thread: Kees Cook: "Re: [RFC v2 3/7] firmware: port built-in section to linker table"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]