Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Add reader owned state to the owner field

[Waiman Long]

On 05/04/2016 01:52 PM, Jason Low wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 13:27 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > On 05/03/2016 08:21 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Waiman Long wrote:
> > > > static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > @@ -378,7 +367,8 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct
> > > > rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > >
> > > >      while (true) {
> > > >          owner = READ_ONCE(sem->owner);
> > > > -        if (owner&&  !rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem, owner))
> > > > +        if (rwsem_is_writer_owned(owner)&&
> > > > +           !rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem, owner))
> > > >              break;
> > > >
> > > >          /* wait_lock will be acquired if write_lock is obtained */
> > > > @@ -391,9 +381,11 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct
> > > > rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > >           * When there's no owner, we might have preempted between the
> > > >           * owner acquiring the lock and setting the owner field. If
> > > >           * we're an RT task that will live-lock because we won't let
> > > > -         * the owner complete.
> > > > +         * the owner complete. We also quit if the lock is owned by
> > > > +         * readers.
> > > >           */
> > > > -        if (!owner&&  (need_resched() || rt_task(current)))
> > > > +        if ((owner == RWSEM_READER_OWNED) ||
> It would be good to provide and use a rwsem_is_reader_owned() function
> like we do with rwsem_is_writer_owned(), especially if we're going to
> add in the additional cast.

Yes, sure I can certainly add the rwsem_is_reader_owned() helper function.

Cheers,
Longman