Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] ALSA: ac97: split out the generic ac97 registers

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 09:06:44PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> > I see that, I just don't know why that helps.

> Ok, so let me explain.

> As you already understood, AC97_VENDOR* is needed in bus.c for the
> autoscanning. The remaining is the reason why I don't want to include
> ac97_codec.h in bus.c, which follows.

> In order to have a clean split between former ac97 bus implementation and this
> new one, I didn't want to include any former ac97 includes, excepting in
> sound/ac97/compat.c.

It's probably a good idea to articulate some of this in the commit log
then!

> This transition will be easier if the new ac97 code is isolated as much as
> possible from the former code while providing backward compatibility ... hence
> this patch.

It'd probably have been clearer to me if it were splitting out all the
register definitions rather than just some of them.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature