RE: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

[Du, Changbin]

> >>> On most platforms, there is only one device controller available.
> >>> In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's ignore the
> >>> name by setting 'UDC' to 'any'.
> >>
> >> Hmm libubsgx allows to do this for a very long time. You simply pass
> >> NULL instead of pointer to usbg_udc.
> >>
> >> It is also possible to do this from command line, just simply:
> >>
> >> $ echo `ls -1 /sys/class/udc | head -n 1` > UDC
> >>
> >> So if we can easily do this from user space what's the benefit of adding
> >> this special "any" keyword to kernel?
> >>
> > Well, it is just for *easy to use*. Looking up /sys/class/udc mostly
> > can be skipped. The UDC core support this convenience behavior,
> > so why don't we export it with a little change?
> >
> 
> Well, I'm not sure if any configfs interface has been proposed as easy
> to use from cmd line. I think they all has been proposed as  *usable*
> from cmd line but not necessarily *easy to use*.
> 
> That's why most of configfs clients has some support in userspace. For
> example for target there is a taget-cli and for usb gadget we have
> libusbg/libusbgx.
> 
Glade to know this tool, it is much more easy to use than interact with sysfs.
I'd like use it. Just see you are the main contributor of this project. :)


> So the functionality which you proposed here is not only already
> implemented in libusbgx but also can be easily achieved from cmd line
> like I showed above.
> 
> In addition this patch will break existing userspace tools (at least
> libusbgx for sure) as it assumes that:
> 
> cat UDC
> 
> should return an empty string or an valid UDC name which can be found
> inside /sys/class/udc.

If so, this is not good.

> >> is really a problem. Personally I'm quite used to situation in which I
> >> have to turn the light off before turning it on once again;)
> >>
> > That is not a problem. But just avoid pseudo 'busy'. If gadget is not
> > bind, it is free to reconfigure it. So seem no need block re-configuration.
> >
> 
> What do you mean pseudo 'busy'? If we do:
> 
> echo <udc-name> > UDC
> 
Sorry, please ignore this. I find if no UDC available, the config will be queued
to a list, and will bind it when a UDC module install. So it is really busy.

> then gadget should be really bound to some udc and potentially really busy.
> 
> > In a word, this patch is just an improvement, not to fix any issues or
> > add new function.
> 
> So it doesn't add any new functionality and breaks existing user space
> tools.
> 

Ok, regarding there is a better tool, this change doesn't make much sense. 
So just abandon it.

> Cheers,
> --
> Krzysztof Opasiak
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics

Best Regards,
Du, Changbin