On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 01:05:05AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:[ ... ]
Yes, I noticed. I had suspected that your need for a driver now was theI know there has been a lengthy discussion about the patch set, but I may
have missed the conclusion. Is there some reason to _not_ advance it
that I may have missed ?
No, we are still continuing with the class driver. We just descided to
split the UCIS into separate driver for now, just because we needed it
to be supported fast. But I did mention in the commit message of the
UCSI patch that the goal is to merge that into a Type-C framework once